Posts in Retirement Planning
Four Unique advantages of Social Security
 
blog image.jpg

Social Security is something we contribute to all our working years, so why don’t we know much about it? What sets it apart from other retirement benefits? I want to briefly share some of the characteristics that make Social Security unique and helpful for retirement planning purposes.

Social Security Includes Spousal Benefits

Social Security spousal income is a benefit provided to married couples. If you have a working income that is less than 50% of your spouse’s normal retirement age benefit, a spousal benefit will be added to your Social Security income to make it equal to 50% of your spouse’s income. Even with no working income (homemaker), 50% of the spouse’s normal retirement age income will be received.

To receive this increase in income, the higher-earning spouse must start their benefits before the spousal payments begin. Check your eligibility for spousal benefits here.

Two more things to note:

  • There is no benefit to delaying spousal income after normal retirement age as it does not continue to grow.

  • If the spouse with the higher income predeceases the spouse with the lower income, the surviving spouse will receive the higher of the two incomes for the rest of their life. For example, let’s say Joe has a social security benefit of $2,800 per month, and his wife, Shirley, has a benefit of $1,400 monthly. At Joe’s death, Shirley will receive $2,800 per month rather than $1,400 per month.

Social Security income is not fully taxable

If you are Married Filing Jointly and have a combined income below $25,000 in 2021, you will not owe taxes on social security benefits. If your income is between $25,000 and $34,000 in 2021, 50% of benefits will be subject to taxation. With income over $44,000 in 2021, a maximum of 85% of benefits will be taxable. Social security income is not subject to Oregon state income tax.

Social Security Income varies based on retirement age

You can start taking social security retirement benefits at the age of 62, but if you are able, it is best to delay taking benefits until normal retirement age (typically age 66). Furthermore, delaying benefits until the age of 70 is even more advantageous, as your income will continue to increase by a certain percentage (based on birth year) until then.

Remember: If benefits are claimed before normal retirement age, half of the benefits will be withheld if income is over $18,960. Benefits will be recalculated at normal retirement age, but it is more beneficial to delay taking social security if someone is planning to work. After reaching normal retirement age, unlimited earned income will not reduce your social security income.

Social Security Income is protected from inflation

Each January the IRS/SSA increases benefits by the amount of inflation experienced over the previous year. These cost-of-living adjustments (COLA’s) are credited even when delaying benefits to a later age. The most recent cost of living adjustment was 1.3% in January 2021. The average estimates over a long period of time are 2.6% annually.

Things to note when applying for benefits:

  • Ensure you have Federal withholdings taken from your benefits, often at 12%.

  • Remember, your Medicare Part B premiums ($148.50 per check) will be deducted from your benefit if you are over age 65.

  • Apply online at www.socialsecurity.gov, by phone at (800) 772-1213, or in person at a Social Security office using the office locator. If you have any questions about social security benefits, please schedule a time to chat.

References:

www.ssa.gov

The Baby Boomer’s Guide to Social Security, Elaine Floyd, CFP®

 

Related Articles

The 3 Questions to Ask to Build a Solid Retirement Income Plan
 

Saving for retirement can seem straightforward compared to the daunting task of converting your hard-earned savings into retirement income.

When building a retirement income plan knowing what questions to ask will potentially save you money, lower your overall tax bill, and provide you peace of mind. Here are three questions you should ask when building a retirement income plan, as well as some considerations:

Question 1: What sources are available to you?

There are many ways to fund retirement. Thus, no retirement plan looks the same. To begin to understand how you will fund retirement, give yourself a quick assessment. What sources are available to you and how much?

retirement-income-01 copy.jpg

What you should consider: Simplicity in retirement. This can be achieved by consolidating retirement accounts such as your employer-sponsored retirement plans into an IRA. See - Why an IRA makes more sense in retirement than your 401(k)

Question 2: When do you plan on receiving income from your different sources?

There are a lot of unique planning opportunities regarding when to start receiving your sources of income. Knowing when to access these different sources can provide efficiency, lower taxes paid, and increase your retirement income.

 The IRS and Social Security Administration have imposed rules that coincide with specific ages. Familiarizing yourself with these key rules and ages associated with accessing popular income sources can help you begin to answer the question of “When?”. Here are some key ages to consider when building a retirement income plan around these popular sources -

Tax-deferred accounts (401(k)/403(b)/IRAs):

  • Age 59.5 - you can’t access tax-deferred dollars without a 10% early withdrawal penalty before age 59.5. The IRS does highlight some exceptions to the 10% penalty for premature withdrawals.

  • Age 72 (or age 70.5 if you were born before 1951) – The IRS requires that an individual withdraws a minimum amount of their retirement plans (i.e. an IRA) each year starting in the year they reach age 72. This requirement is known as a required minimum distribution or an RMD. Account-holders that do not take their full RMD will be faced with a stiff excise tax equal to 50% of the RMD not withdrawn.

Social Security:

Most Americans can begin claiming Social Security retirement benefits as early as age 62, or as late as age 70. Once you stop working, it can be tempting to claim Social Security as soon as possible to subsidize your income. However, it’s often strategic to delay Social Security as long as possible. The longer you delay claiming your Social Security benefit the greater your guaranteed inflation-adjusted monthly benefit will grow (up to age 70). Factors that should be considered when creating a plan around Social Security are life expectancy, other sources of retirement income, and spousal benefits.

retirement-income-02 copy.jpg

What you should consider:

  • Which sources you will draw first?

  • Should you delay social security as long as possible?

  • How long each source will last?

Question 3: What are the tax implications of accessing your retirement income sources?

Not all income sources are taxed at the same rate. Take the time to understand your applicable taxes and build a tax-sensitive retirement income plan to prevent paying unnecessary amounts to the government.

retirement-income-03.jpg

What you should consider:

  • The tax implications of the aforementioned RMD’s. RMD’s can unknowingly force you to pay a higher than necessary tax bill once you are forced to take required withdrawals.

  • A tax bracket optimization strategy that provides savings on your overall retirement tax bill. This can be especially beneficial in the early years of retirement. Learn more about Tax Bracket Optimization here.

The misfortune of not having a retirement income strategy.

Heading into retirement without an income strategy is financially precarious. To illustrate the benefit of creating an effective plan, we are sharing a hypothetical example.  Meet Charlie and Frankie:

  • Charlie (age 61) and Frankie (age 60) live in Oregon and each plan to retire when they turn age 62.

  • Charlie has $1,000,000 in a 401k/traditional IRA.

  • Frankie has $250,000 in a 401k/traditional IRA.

  • They have $150,000 in joint accounts.

  • At age 67 Charlie and Frankie are eligible to receive $2,990/month and $2,376/month, respectively.

  • Their annual income goal during retirement is $90,000.

In the following charts, we compare the impact of an efficient retirement income strategy to one that is not. The only thing that is different in the two scenarios is the consideration of when to draw specific sources and the associated tax implications. Unfortunately, when managed inefficiently the couple is only able to maintain their target annual income for 26 years. Additionally, the inefficient strategy forces the couple to pay an additional $129,000 tax over 30 years when compared to a more efficient strategy.

 
inefficient-retirement-income.jpg
efficient-retirement-income.jpg
 

Assumptions: 4% investment rate of return on all accounts. No additional contributions are made to investment accounts. Taxes include both Federal and Oregon State income tax.

This is one of the most important financial decisions you can make.

Taking the time to thoroughly answer these questions can provide long-term value.

Engaging with a financial planning firm can be helpful if you are not fully confident in making a retirement income plan. Working with the right financial planning firm for your unique situation can be the difference between a carefree retirement and a stressful one. To learn more about how we think about serving clients through comprehensive financial planning, check out our services here.

 

 
 

Related Articles

Retirement Income Planning: PERS Benefit Options
 

Are you retiring from PERS soon? Provided below is a concise breakdown of the most common benefit options and what they mean.

PERS BENEFITS OPTIONS.png

Often it makes the most sense to receive a lesser monthly benefit while protecting your loved ones with a survivorship option. Comparatively, it is like paying insurance monthly to ensure there is income for your beneficiary if you should die prematurely.

There are many more factors to consider, but a written estimate and analysis in coordination with your financial plan will provide a platform for deciding the best option for you and your family.

 


Related Articles

Why an IRA Makes More Sense in Retirement Than Your 401(k)
 
bahador-z6qLnIF1zl8-unsplash.jpg

401(k) plans are powerful tools individuals can use to save and invest for retirement. I would argue that with high individual contribution limits, tax advantages, and employer contributions, a 401(k) is the best tool to save for retirement. In fact, we love 401(k)’s so much as a savings tool we wrote the book on it - Becoming a 401(k) Millionaire (actually Peter Fisher our CEO did).

While 401(k)'s have helped answer the question "How to save for retirement?", they do not answer "How to turn retirement savings into retirement income?". That’s where Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) enter the picture. IRAs provide flexibility in retirement that towers above 401(k) plans in three key areas: investment selection, distribution strategy (taking money out), and tax efficiency.

Building an Investment strategy for retirement

Utilizing investment options that align with your retirement goals and needs is important for a successful financial plan. According to Vanguard, the average 401k plan has 27.2 investment options for employees to choose from1. This is a positive for 401k investors to avoid choice overload, but not always optimal for distributions. Compared to a 401(k), IRAs provide for much greater flexibility on the types of investment options available. The flexibility of investment options in an IRA can help to build a customized investment strategy to align with someone's retirement needs/goals. The shortlist of investments an IRA can hold are Individual Stocks, Mutual Funds, Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Bonds, US Treasuries, CDs, and Annuities.

Strategizing Distributions

Saving money in a retirement account is not a means to an end. There is a purpose to it, and for most the goal is retirement. We put money into a retirement account so that we may withdraw it someday when we are no longer receiving a paycheck. When building an efficient distribution strategy, flexibility is key.

While most 401(k) plans can administer distributions in retirement, there is often less control of how the money comes out of your account. As an example, let's assume you have two different investment options inside of your 401(k) account. One investment is geared for growth and the other for conservation (short-term needs).

With a 401(k), there is less flexibility than an IRA when choosing which investment you can choose to sell to take a cash distribution. Let’s say 50% of your 401(k) is in your growth investment and the other 50% is in your conservative. For every $1,000 you take out of your 401k, $500 will come from the sale of your Growth Investment and the other $500 from your conservative investment.

What happens when your growth investment loses 10-20% of its value due to normal market volatility? When you need your next distribution, your 401k will sell both the conservative investment as well as the growth investment (whose value has just decreased). By taking money out of a 401(k) during normal market volatility, you are violating the first rule of investing: buy low, sell high.

If 401(k) distributions are an entrée, an IRA is an a la carte. With an IRA you can choose which investment to sell to fund your distribution needs. If your growth investment has lost some of its value, you don't have to sell. You can use more of your conservative investment while you wait for the market to rebound. While in a good market where your growth investment increases in value by 10-20%, an IRA gives you the flexibility to sell high on your growth investment.

Tax efficiency

If not taken into consideration, taxes can squander someone's retirement account balance. It is important to withhold and pay the correct amount as you take withdrawals from your tax-deferred retirement account. Here is how 401(k)’s and IRA’s differ with regards to tax withholding:

For 401(k) distributions, the IRS requires a mandatory withholding of 20% for Federal Income Tax purposes. The account holder can request more to be withheld federally, but not less. The account holder can also withhold applicable state income tax. For example, say the account holder needs to withdraw $1,000 (net) from their 401(k). The plan provider will make sure there is 20% withheld for federal tax purposes. For every $1,000 needed, the account holder will withdraw $1,250 (The calculation: $1,000 ÷ 0.8 = $1,250). This mandatory withholding can be very convenient. However, what happens if taxes owed in retirement are less than 20%? The extra withholding will likely come back to you as a return once you file taxes. Unfortunately, there may be an opportunity cost. By withdrawing too much, the tax-deferred compounding growth on these dollars is lost.

An IRA provides flexibility to withhold (or not withhold) at a lesser amount to avoid selling unnecessary investments from a retirement account. If the federal tax owed is 11%, 11% can be withheld from the IRA. This saves the account holder 9% or $126 from being withheld, comparing to the 401k example above ($1000 ÷ 0.89 = $1,124). If this account holder withdrawals $1,000 each month, there is an additional $1,512 withheld each year. IRA’s provide a higher level of efficiency with the flexibility in tax withholdings.

Account Type Matters

Which account is right for you in retirement? Well, it depends. If you are you planning to retire earlier than age 59 ½, 401k plans offer some advantages (See "Rule of 55"). For most, however, an IRA makes sense. An IRA can provide superior flexibility to someone in retirement that cannot be matched by company-sponsored retirement plans like 401(k) plans. This is not a knock on 401(k)’s, rather a promotion of the benefits provided by an IRA. Consider the pros and cons of different account types to make sure they match up with your investment goals.

Sources

 1 The Vanguard Group, How America Saves Report - 2020.

 

 
 

Related Articles

A Reminder to Keep Your 401k Boxes Checked
 
We are now crossing a zone of turbulence. The Captain has turned on the fasten seat belt sign. Please remain seated. Thank you.

We are now crossing a zone of turbulence. The Captain has turned on the fasten seat belt sign. Please remain seated. Thank you.

Human Investing serves as a fiduciary on a variety of employer-sponsored retirement plans. We get the opportunity to meet with individuals with different vocations, interests, and life goals.  This is because we advise retirement plans ranging across different industries, different ownership structures, and different geographic locations. We have also established on-site client visits at different points in the year.

Over the years, we have provided advice throughout different market highs and lows.

That’s a lot of differences.

Despite these differences, we have a similar conversation with each retirement plan participant. We remind participants that it’s the decades and not the days that are important for building one’s retirement savings. Given the current market volatility, it’s not surprising that we have been receiving more phone calls than usual. And these calls are welcomed! It is our job to ensure that participants feel equipped and empowered to survive this turbulence.

Both financially and emotionally, one of the best ways to thrive in market volatility is to ensure that you have created a sound strategy for your 401k account.

What do we think is a sound strategy?

When we meet with 401k participants, we discuss their expected retirement age and then check these three boxes:

  1. Savings Rate

  2. Tax Advantages

  3. Investment Strategy

Your retirement horizon is a key driver for the synchronization of tax advantages, a contribution amount, and an investment strategy geared for your retirement age. If we have spoken before, then we would have checked these boxes. Note that market volatility in and of itself does not uncheck boxes, but it often prompts us to review our account setup. 

If you are not expecting to access your dollars soon, then my gentle reminder to you is as follows: by doing nothing, you are doing something. If you sustain your contribution rate and remain invested in the stock market, your account will grow over time. To illustrate this concept, see the chart our team created to show the importance of being invested today.

Total values (assuming a 7% annual rate of return and an inflation rate of 3.22%). Actual results will vary.

Total values (assuming a 7% annual rate of return and an inflation rate of 3.22%). Actual results will vary.

Lastly, and most importantly, we recognize that today is stressful. We feel it, too. Quite frankly, there is something for everyone to worry about. Please take precautions and be mindful that your mental and physical health is of utmost importance during this time.

 
 
 

Related Articles

Is Your Debt Crippling Your Future Retirement?
 

We have all been told to save for retirement.  We need the “Magic Number” before we can retire.  What about having debt during retirement?  Most retirement planning calculators ignore debt and debt payments can limit the amount of future income and can wreak havoc on retirement.  A comprehensive financial plan considers debt in the retirement equation providing a tool and process to fully answer the retirement questions.

Studies Show Debt is Increasing for those Entering Retirement

More of us than ever before have debt going into retirement.  A study by Lusardi, Mitchell and Oggero entitled “Debt Close to Retirement and Its Implications for Retirement Well-being,” quotes numerous findings demonstrating that those nearing retirement have increased borrowing at all economic levels.  Based on a 2015 NFCS survey of persons from age 56 to 61, 37% had mortgages, 11% had home equity loans, 14.6% still had student loan debt, 29.6% carried auto loan debt and, 36.4% had credit card debt with a balance paying interest.  And more concerning, 23% had what they called, “expensive credit card behavior” meaning, “paying the minimum only, paying late or over-the-limit fees, or using credit cards for cash advances.”  

Debt Pre-Retirement.png

Debt is a Presumption of the Future

When we take out debt, we presume that we will have future income that will both cover living expenses and the additional payments we promise to make.  We effectively reduce our future income.  For the retiree with adequate income and assets, debt might be okay.  The retiree that has cash in an account to purchase a car that takes a no interest loan might come out ahead.  And at any time, they have the power to pay off that debt.  However, often debt is a decision that can cripple future living.

Debt in Retirement Limits Lifestyle

Of course, a debt payment means higher total expenses, but it doesn’t stop there.  Debt usually means more expense due to the added interest.  Additional debt and interest require higher retirement distributions.  Higher distributions from IRA accounts increase taxable income and can increase the likelihood Social Security income will also be taxed.  And for many, the result of the compounding expenses due to debt eventually lead to the need for a cut to lifestyle and live on less. To the 23% with “expensive” debt behavior in the study, even more expenses come due to late payments and higher interest costs which further the cycle of limits on lifestyle.

Financial Planning Answers the Questions

While some debt might be considered “okay”, most we know is not.  How do we know?  The answer comes in a financial plan.  It pulls together all the other pieces of the story and provides a structure to answer the question.  A financial plan provides possible options, strategies and answers.  It is a tool and process that fully answers the retirement equation.  Do I have enough for retirement, including debt?

Want to create your financial plan today?

 

Related Articles





Closing The Gap For The Retirement Haves And Have-Nots
 

This article was originally published on Forbes.

Shutterstock

Shutterstock

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was established in 1974 to give employees retirement income security. Why, then, after 40-plus years, are Americans so underprepared for retirement?

According to a 2015 study from the Government Accountability Office, "About half of households age 55 and older have no retirement savings (such as in a 401(k) plan or an IRA)." Even those who have saved have saved poorly. Among those households of residents ages 55 to 64 with some retirement savings, the median amount saved is $104,000. For those 65 to 74, the amount is roughly $148,000 per household. And, with 70% of the civilian population having access to a retirement plan and 91% access for government employees, it’s a wonder there is such a lack of retirement readiness.

There is no shortage of financial and intellectual capital being spent on a solution for retirement readiness. But most solutions have fallen short of narrowing the gap between the retirement haves and have-nots. So, what is the solution? My thoughts follow:

Government Plus Employer Plus Employee

First, the government is already involved in the regulation of retirement plans, as well as allowing for employers to deduct the expenses of having a plan, so why not go all in? Why not tell employers, “If you are going to get the deduction, you need to meet certain requirements that are great for employees, great for your business and great for our country”?

Those requirements could include auto-enrollment (as this has been a home-run for participation), auto-increase (as individuals get raises, they add a little more to their retirement) and an eligible age-based default option (eligibility for a great default option would be low-cost and diversified as you get from the likes of popular mutual fund providers with their index retirement glide path funds).

In order to qualify for a business deduction or incentive from the government, an employer would be required to match a certain amount. I’d propose 5%, with the employee required to commit 5% to get that amount. Why these amounts? Because if someone has a job for 40 years and invests in a basket of mutual funds growing at or around 8%, with both the employee and employer contributing at 5% each, they end up a millionaire (assuming a $36,000 annual salary, or $300 per month contributions, compounded monthly for 40 years.)

The Industry

In a recent Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) study, more than 70% of HR professionals surveyed emphasized the importance a retirement savings plan. So, at a minimum, employees are aware of the need to save and desire to do so. While there is definitely a need amongst employees to save for retirement, there are several barriers that impact participants interest and willingness to save. First, trust among advisors is low. Second, many plans have a dizzying array of options, which negatively impacts deferral rates. Finally, not all employers offer to match contributions, which minimizes the incentive for employees to contribute to the 401(k) versus less automated choices, like an IRA.

So, what can the industry do to partner with employers and their workforce? There are two things in my view:

1. Understand the heart of ERISA. Advisors and their firms are to put the interests of the employee and their income security at the center of everything they are doing. If, somehow, the advice we are giving in any way conflicts with the employee and their security, then we should reassess what we are doing and meet the stated purpose of ERISA -- it doesn’t need to be any more complex.

2. In order to minimize the potential for anything but the fiduciary standard, any firm operating in the retirement space should be required to be a fiduciary and have no ability to be dually registered or receive commissions, kickbacks, trips or any other super-secret benefit.

Join the small percentage of firms that are truly fee-only and have no way of receiving any form of compensation other than from the client. Disclosing away conflicts is not the answer for the clients, as few read the disclosures they are provided. If we are going to serve clients well, eliminating the ability for the conflict to exist is the only reasonable route to go.

In conclusion, the government is already involved in both rule-making and incentives for companies and their employees to offer and invest in retirement plans. A model for offering a retirement plan that meets certain criteria in order to fully receive the incentive should be outlined and adhered to by companies and their employees. In partnership with the government, employers and employees, the financial services community should be held to a higher standard to eliminate the conflicts that keep retirement plans for becoming all they could be, which is for employee retirement income security.

 

 
 

Related Articles