Posts in Financial Planning
Combating the investing FOMO (and FOBI) in all of us
 

In a recent interview Jason Zweig, a personal finance columnist for the WSJ, had a quote that resonated with me.   

  "Emotional discipline is the single hardest thing about the investment game."   

After accumulating over 30 years of writing and thinking about investing and personal finance, Jason points to emotion (not market valuations, stock picking, or market corrections) as the most difficult part of investing.  As financial advisors, we witness the struggle of emotional discipline firsthand. Recent news (and noise) around tech stocks, housing prices, federal spending, cryptocurrencies, inflation, and interest rates have made it more difficult for investors to maintain this discipline.  

are you an investor facing FOMO or FOBI?  

This lack of emotional discipline manifests itself typically in one of two ways:   

  1. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) in the market. If you are 15 years old, FOMO is seeing your friends doing something without you on social media. If you are an investor, FOMO is the internal dialogue of “I see my neighbor making money on ____, I need to buy ___.” Someone who has FOMO tends to follow the crowds. FOMO can lead an investor to think their rate of return is a benchmark for their success rather than achieving a return needed for a successful financial plan.

  2. Fear of Being In (FOBI) the market. FOBI is the internal dialogue of “I have seen how this story ends. I need to sell ____.” Someone who has FOBI likely listens to news sources who make a profit off pessimistic news. Note: It is easy to push the sell button, it is always harder to get back in.  

FOMO and FOBI may seem different, however, both are ultimately trying to guess where the market will go next and are speculative in nature. Let 2020 be a great reminder that it’s difficult to predict how the market or a particular investment will do year to year.  

Periodic Table of Investment Returns from the last 20 years

One of my favorite charts to illustrate the difficulty to predict short-term performance is "The Periodic Table of Investment Returns". This graph ranks the annual returns of popular asset classes from best to worst over the last 20 years.   

Source: Blackrock; Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information provided is for illustrative purposes and is not meant to represent the performance of any particular investment. Assumes reinvestment of all distributions. It is…

Source: Blackrock; Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information provided is for illustrative purposes and is not meant to represent the performance of any particular investment. Assumes reinvestment of all distributions. It is not possible to directly invest in an index. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss.

An investor experiencing FOMO is likely paying attention to the top row, the best-returning asset classes over the last 20 years. This investor is likely trying to guess what will be the highest performing asset class in the coming year.  

Meanwhile, an investor experiencing FOBI is likely paying closer attention to the bottom rows, with a specific focus on larger market selloffs like 2001, 2002, and 2008. A FOBI investor is worried about being invested in the wrong asset class and will try to avoid the worst-performing asset class in the coming year.  

The Periodic Table of Investment Returns reminds me of three investing truths:   

  1. It can be dangerous to try and guess what is next. Consider US small-cap stocks (Sm Cap – in light green), which had the highest average annual return over the 20 years. While small-cap stocks were the best performer they also showed the widest variance in outcomes. Guessing right in 2003 would have provided a positive return of 47.3%. Guessing wrong in 2008 would have provided a negative return of 33.8%. 

  2. Past performance is not an indicator of future returns. Making investment decisions based on recent performance (e.g., looking at 1, 3, and 5-year returns) can be detrimental to an investment portfolio.  International’s performance as a prime example (Int’l – in yellow), over the five years from 2003-2007 international was the best performing asset class by a long shot. International seemed like the sure thing. Unfortunately, the investors who followed international’s high returns were greeted with a brutal 43% selloff in 2008.   

  3. Portfolio diversification is the answer to combating FOMO and FOBI – See “Div portfolio” in purple along the middle rows.  Diversification is an investment strategy that aims to maximize a level of return for the risk desired. Diversification accomplishes this by strategically spreading money across different types of investments.   

 A diversified portfolio helps investors maintain emotional discipline. Diversification can avoid the fear of missing out on the next hot investment. Owning more of the market will naturally provide more opportunities to not miss out on the growth of specific sectors or individual investments. Diversification can also temper being fearful of being in the market and owning the next big loser. Diversification disperses your dollars across many asset classes, which means if one company is a dud it will not sink the ship.  

If you struggle with emotional discipline when investing, congratulations you are a human. If helpful, please use The Periodic Table of Investment Returns as a great reminder that emotional discipline is difficult. Putting a plan in place along with proper diversification can help investors make smart long-term decisions.

 

 
 

Related Articles

Hello Speculation, My Old Friend
 

The term speculation[1] has been on the steady decline since 1840. The decline in use is somewhat surprising given the current market environment where speculation runs rampant. In recent weeks, our team inked a well-thought-out article about the speculation du jour titled, The Big Short: Volume II Starring $GME . Interestingly, they could have been writing about any of the past's speculations—like the Dutch Tulipmania in the 1630s and the roaring 20s that ran up to the 1929 crash. More recently, tech stock speculation reached a fevered pitch in the 2000s and was followed by an equally thrilling run-up in housing which peaked in Q1 2007.

“Speculation is easy to spot, but it is difficult to understand what brings speculative environments to an end.”

Memory Lane (1995-2000)

Speculation in technology stocks lasted for six years. Money managers and even the Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan noted the overall frothiness of the markets. In his 1996 public address, Chairman Greenspan pondered, "but how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values…?" From 1995 to 2000, the Nasdaq grew sixfold (see Figure 1 below). Over several years, beginning in March of 2000, the tech-heavy Nasdaq stock index lost nearly 80% of its value. Even the "blue chip" tech stocks of the day: Cisco, Intel, and Oracle, fell fast. But because they had well established and viable business', they crawled from the rubble and thrived. But the road to recovery took 15 years as the Nasdaq crossed through its previous market peak set in March of 2000 in April of 2015.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Reason for the speculation?

As was the case leading up to the peak of the .com era, much of today's speculation has been brought about by venture capital (VC) investment. Key statistics surrounding VC investment are at or near all-time highs. This includes deal activity, VC-backed IPO's, and VC-backed M & A. You can learn more about VCs and speculation here. The influence of M & A on the market dynamics is meaningful—particularly for retail investors who see what VCs are doing and want a piece of the action. In the book, The Psychology of Money, the author notes that "people have a tendency to be influenced by the actions of other people who are playing a different financial game than they are." VC investors are some of the most sophisticated investors in the world.  Simply put, VC investors are playing a different financial game than most people who want to get a piece of their action.

One reason for concern is that a mass of money is being put into the capital markets, including VCs, with a speculative bent. This changes the market's disposition. The stock market can quickly turn from a place to save for retirement and invest for college to a casino or dog track, where a quick buck can be made. The bottom line is that investing and speculating are not the same thing. In the last 25 years, the most successful investors I have observed have relied on simple truths to accumulate their wealth. They make their money by saving and investing over a lifetime. To be sure, some speculators hit it big, and those will be the stories you hear about. Others, as is the case with most speculative investments, will lose everything.

Access, Gamification, and Human Nature

This go-around, the rise of speculative investing seems to have a social appeal. With stock trading commissions at zero and gamified investment platforms, both access and the fun factor are present at levels I've never seen before. On the one hand, I'm thrilled that more people are interested in the capital markets. But I wonder if tools and access make investing more like a casino or betting app than serious investors' tools to achieve lifelong financial goals. If investing is being marketed to fulfill all your dreams in a couple of keystrokes, why wait a lifetime?

It is human nature to want a piece of what is working—after all, who wouldn't?  We all know someone who made their money quickly. For every person who made an easy buck and won the lottery, millions of us are going to need to do it the hard way. Yes, the wet blanket approach to investing—like spending less than what you earn and putting a little away each month to an emergency fund. Forgoing a slice of your paycheck today so that you have something to live off when you are no longer generating an income from your labor. Driving the same old car so the payments you would otherwise have with a new car can go to your child's college savings account. I know what some of you may be saying, "he just doesn't get it." Maybe not, but what is true is that if investors do not choose a path, it will be selected for them. Or if not, they may bounce around from one path to another, making for a very emotional and disjointed investing experience. One path has a high probability of success because it relies on disciplined saving and investing behavior over a lifetime. The other approach is speculative, looks fun, is incredible to talk about, and has social equity—but unfortunately has a fractional probability of success.

Tesla and bubbles

There are plenty of speculative investments that will make an article like this seem out of touch and tired. Maybe so. Take the electric car manufacturer who recently booked its first full year of profits. Yep, the investor and media darling Tesla is worth $800 billion and just turned a profit in 2020 for the first time since it was founded in 2003. The only issue is that it is not from selling cars. The bulk of their profit comes from selling regulatory tax credits, not from selling cars. Read more about Tesla here. This is fine, and I own a few Tesla shares inside my low-cost Vanguard S&P 500 index fund. The point in sharing a story about Tesla is not to shame those that own the stock, nor is it a knock on the product as they make a good car. Instead, it highlights the influence of VC money and corresponding expectation for speculative investing and returns.

Dr. Olivier Blanchard, the most cited economist in the world, penned a 1979 masterpiece where he said this,

"Self-ending speculative bubbles, i.e., speculative bubbles followed by market crashes, are consistent with the assumptions of rational expectations. More generally, speculative bubbles may take all kinds of shapes. Detecting their presence or rejecting their existence is likely to prove very hard."

If speculation were a person, I would write it a letter. It would be short. It would go like this, "As for our families and how we advise Human Investing clients, we view each dollar as hard earned and essential to a well thought out financial plan. There is no play money or money we can afford to lose. As such, we are not much for speculation." Sincerely, your wet blanket.

[1] Merriam-Webster defines speculation as “a risky undertaking.” Thesaurus notes it is a “theory, guess, risk, or gamble.”

 

 
 

Related Articles

The Big Short: Volume II Starring $GME
 
image.jpg

Last week GameStop went viral as a topic unlike anything I’d seen in my 10 years at Human Investing. Probably just like you, I googled “Gamma Squeeze”, had someone two degrees of separation from me divulge they had been a part of wallstreetbets, and now have significantly more money, and felt like I was watching a version of March Madness play out real-time in the financial markets.

With the introduction of free trading and the gamification of trading stocks with apps like Robinhood, this past week was the culmination of many factors colliding (more on that later). Different than in The Big Short (2008 Real Estate Crisis) where select hedge funds were taking advantage of large investment banks being overleveraged in the housing market, this time it was retail investors taking advantage of hedge funds overleveraged in GameStop. If Michael Lewis or someone else isn‘t writing this book already I’d be shocked, and I can’t wait for the movie too.

Most of the questions our team has been fielding this week looked like a version of:

  • Why GameStop?

  • Why now?

  • Explain this to me like I’m 5

  • Is this a one-time occurrence or is something like this going to be happening more frequently?

  • And probably most importantly what does this mean for me, my investments, and the markets as a whole?

To help me answer some of these questions I’ve enlisted our head analyst, Andrew Gladhill. In our office known as Glads. For those of you who haven’t spoken with Glads or seen his work, he’s a CFA and anyone who knows him would most likely have him on their Who Wants to be Millionaire “phone a friend” shortlist. Maybe most importantly, one of the ways Glads makes our team better is being able to take complex topics and break them down in very digestible terms. Take it away!

Some key terms you need to know

Shorting

The short answer: Shorting is betting that a price will go down (not up), and you benefit as the price goes down. For example, if you short a stock trading at $20, and it goes down to $15, you have made $5.

The long answer: Shorting works through a few steps:

  • Step 1 – you borrow the stock today from someone who holds the stock (Let’s call them Emily) with a set date you must return the stock back to Emily. Emily lends you the stock because Emily charges you interest.

  • Step 2 – you sell the stock today (say for $20)

  • Step 3 – you must return the stock to Emily, plus interest (say $1) buying it at the current market price to do so (say $15)

  • In this example, you have made $4 (Sold for $20, bought for $15, charged $1 interest)

Why do you short? Because you believe something is overvalued, and you want to profit from when the price goes down.

short-selling copy.jpg

Short Squeeze

The short answer: When a shorted position has the price increase, those who are shorting it (the shorters) are forced to buy the position, driving the price up further.

The long answer: If the price rises on a short position, the shorter starts losing money. They can either hedge their losses by buying the stock before the return date, or wait to buy and hope the price falls. Remember, the shorter must return the stock to the original owner by a set deadline. Because the price of the stock can rise higher and higher, the shorter’s potential loss is limitless.

So a short squeeze is when the price of a company goes up because lots of people are buying a heavily shorted stock, increasing the price. The rise in price causes some shorters to close out their positions, which involves buying the stock. More buying activity causes the price to increase, causing greater losses for the shorters. If the price rises high enough, the losses get large enough that more shorters are forced to close out their short position to avoid having their total portfolio value go negative. This creates a positive feedback cycle of buying activity, pushing the stock price even higher.

cycle.jpg

Why WAS Gamestop ($GME) TARGETED?

The Short answer: GME had an unusually high amount of shares sold short, allowing the short squeeze to be possible. Retail investors gathered online & decided to try to make it happen.

The Long Answer: Short float is the number of shares sold short (borrowed & then sold) that have not yet been repurchased. Gamestop had a short float over 100%, meaning some shares of Gamestop had been lent out more than once. This happened because many believed Gamestop (a retail video game store) was the next Blockbuster and would go out of business. The share price would go to $0 a share, and they would profit from the price dropping. Some retail investors noticed the high short float on GME in an online community known as reddit wallstreetbets (aka WSB, aka retail investors). The retail investors saw an opportunity for a short squeeze due to the large short interest, and GME being a relatively small company.

The retail investors planned to force a short squeeze on GME. The retail investors would buy up as many shares of GME as possible, driving up the price. The retail investors would hold their shares, drying up the supply, pushing the price up even further. All this upward price movement would force a short squeeze, driving the price up even further, and the positive feedback cycle would result in astronomical price increases for GME as the short squeeze hits. Retail investors will be able to sell their shares at high prices to the shorters forced to closing out their position.

Why was trading restricted?

The short answer: Companies that execute trades (brokerages, i.e. Robinhood) must have money to cover trade differences with clearing firms (the back end companies that finalize trades) as collateral. The rapid, unexpected movement in GME brought some brokerages ability to do that into question, and they had to pause the trading until they could secure more funding.

The long answer: When you sell or purchase a stock, that trade isn’t finalized until settlement, which is 2 days later. This time is used to verify the transfer of cash & the security purchased. It’s like when you deposit a check at the bank, the bank makes sure the check clears before you can withdraw cash. Clearing firms finalize stock transactions. The brokerages (i.e. Robinhood, Fidelity, Schwab, e-Trade) are required by law to maintain cash deposits as collateral with clearing firms to cover any losses. The required deposits by the clearing firms for the brokerages went up because GME was having higher price volatility. Some brokerages had to pause trading in GME while they secured enough funding to make the deposits required by the clearing firms. The financial system rarely handles meteoric rises in stock prices in such a short amount of time, and certain parts of the system that normally work so smoothly we never think about them suddenly brought trading to a screeching halt.

what does this mean for me and my portfolio?

Thank you, Glads. This story and its ramifications are certainly not finished. As more details come out it will continue to paint a clearer picture of what it means for investors over the past week and looking forward as well. To bring this all home and answer the question, “what does this mean for me and my portfolio” a few thoughts:

While Gamestop took up all the headlines this past week, for most investors it had little to no impact on their portfolio. For example, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund (VTI), is a staple in many retirement accounts across the country, the fund was down 3.59% last week (in line with the market). GameStop contributed a positive 0.04% return to the fund (basically nothing!) despite being up nearly 655% on the week, a bi-product of how small of a company GameStop is relative to other companies in the fund that truly move the needle.

vanguard.jpg

So should I get in?

Should you open up a trading account in preparation of the next public short-squeeze? The boring/correct answer is this is not the forum to be giving specific financial advice for your specific situation. If you’re truly speculating about that and want to talk to it through, PLEASE sign up for a Calendly link with one of our advisors and they are happy to talk with you about it.

My favorite book I’ve read in the past few months is The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel. It’s one of the best (in my opinion) personal finance books because it focuses on behavior (potential controllable actions) rather than guessing what’s the next best stock is. He has an entire chapter devoted to the topic of, “People have a tendency to be influenced by the actions of other people who are playing a different financial game than they are.” This is the case for most people saving for retirement when thinking about GameStop, shorting, and what we’ve seen in the news. It’s Human to feel like you missed on an opportunity with GameStop and to want to hit it big on the next trade. But most likely that’s not your game.  Most likely your game (and mine too) involves saving and investing for a long time, letting compounding interest take care of the rest, and maybe most importantly staying out of your own way. And while that game doesn’t create the same headlines, as Housel writes in a different chapter it can create a different type of headline to aspire to.

 

 
 

Related Articles

How Some Millennials are More Resilient during Financial Shocks
 

According to most research, although millennials are considered the most highly educated generation, we are the least informed when it comes to our financial decisions. Not only do we lack financial literacy, but pre COVID-19, 63% of millennials felt anxious when thinking about their financial situation, and 55% felt stressed when discussing their financial situation. I imagine COVID-19 has negatively impacted those figures even further.

There are many factors that affect our personal financial stress levels, but historically, the financial industry has felt inaccessible to those who lack financial literacy and/or feel insecure about their financial situation. How are we supposed to learn if we lack access to knowledge?

SAVINGS APPS TO SAVE THE DAY

I love the concept of savings apps, because it improves accessibility of investing and saving for a large population. Basically, if you have a smart phone and a few extra dollars, you can be a saver. A study conducted in 2019 found that individuals who used savings apps kept better track of their finances and were more resilient when faced with a financial shock. However, accessibility without education can be hazardous. So, here are two recommended savings apps that provide learning and saving opportunities.

  • Mint is a free app powered by INTUIT (think Turbo Tax) that houses all of your financial information in one place. Mint uses a holistic view and budgeting tools to find extra savings for you. Not only do they provide you with custom savings tips, but they also have a hub of resources, ranging from building a grocery budget to investing advice, so you can learn along the way!

  • Digit has the same philosophy as Mint: find savings within your current financial situation. With this philosophy, Digit analyzes your current income and expenses and then lets you know what you can afford to save. They invest your dollars in FDIC insured account using a portfolio based on your risk level and comfortability. You are also able to attach these savings to a specific goal – emergency savings, honeymoon, a doggo—you name it. There is a monthly cost of $5, but you do receive 1% annual bonus savings every three months.

NOT FEELING IT? FOLLOW THEIR SAVING PHILOSOPHIES

It’s okay if you don’t vibe with the savings app world. But if you do want a better grip on your finances, follow the philosophy behind the savings apps:

  1. Keep track of your income.

  2. Assess your spending habits.

  3. See where you can save.

savings blog doodle23.png

For me, that looks like walking past the gluten-free bakery every so often instead of into it (which is usually the case) and saving the extra $5. At the end of the month it can make a difference (Don’t believe me? See how much you can save by ditching your morning coffee here).

Finally, allow yourself to interact with financial resources without being too hard on yourself. The purpose of these apps is not to be a report card. The purpose is to empower you to make thoughtful decisions that will improve your financial health. If you have questions, check out our Financial Wellness Center or reach out! We are here for you.

 

 
 

Related Articles

What Is a Fiduciary?
 
trust.jpeg

A fiduciary is defined as an individual or a legal entity, such as a financial advisor. The fiduciary takes on the responsibility and has the power to act in the interest of another. This other person is called a beneficiary or principal—we call them member, human, or client.

A fiduciary financial advisor (which is all we have at Human Investing) cannot sell products that charge or pay commissions.

When a member works with a Human Investing financial advisor, the client gives the advisor their trust and expects recommendations to be made with honesty and good faith in keeping with their best interests. This may not always be the case with a non-fiduciary advisor.

The Fiduciary Standard

All Human Investing employees are required to abide by the fiduciary standard. When a financial advisor has a fiduciary duty, they must always act in the beneficiary's best interest.

Financial advisors fall into two buckets: fiduciaries and non-fiduciaries. Surprisingly, not all financial advisors have a requirement to put member's interests first. Worse yet, some advisors and their firms can be dually registered, swapping back and forth between fiduciary and non-fiduciary roles.

Suitability Standard vs. Fiduciary Standard

Financial professionals who are not fiduciaries are held to a lesser standard known as the "suitability standard." What this means is that the recommendation from a non-fiduciary only needs to be adequate.

Other Watch Outs When selecting an Advisor

If an advisor states that they have FINRA Series 7, 6, or 63, that means they are licensed to sell products for commissions. An advisor would only have those licenses for two reasons: 1) to sell commission products or 2) collect commissions from products they (or someone else) have sold.

There are many individuals and firms that say they are financial planners and do financial planning. But did you know that many of the people that say they are financial planners are not trained in the process and profession of being a financial planner? Individuals responsible for member financial planning are CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNERS™. A CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ certification is “the standard of excellence in financial planning. CFP® professionals meet rigorous education, training and ethical standards, and are committed to serving their clients' best interests today to prepare them for a more secure tomorrow.”

 

Related Articles

Charts of the Year
 

As 2020 comes to an end, our team is sharing seven charts that help summarize some of the puzzling financial activity we experienced this year. We have been including these charts in our group education meetings as visual aids to help explain 2020’s market volatility. For the readers who did not attend one of these meetings, we made this post for you to reference in the future.

1 sp500.jpg
2 sp500.jpg

2020 was a year that represented a disconnect between the stock market and the economy for many investors. On one hand, the stock market (represented by the S&P 500) is up over 14% this year. On the other hand, many local businesses and industries have been devastated by the pandemic. Investors had a difficult time sorting out those two facts, especially between late March and September.

In order to rationalize 2020 market returns, we look to the five largest companies in the S&P 500 (in chart 1 and 2) that have led the charge in terms in performance. Specifically, these five companies are Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook. Compared to industries like airlines, hotels, and restaurants, these five companies were able to offer services and be agile in the pandemic. Couple that with those five companies making up over 21% of the stock market (the largest piece of the pie chart in the last years) and you can create a narrative of why the market has performed well while areas of the economy have struggled.

3 robinhood.jpg

Repeat after me, past performance does not guarantee future results. It’s important to remember that now more than ever because 2020 produced some impressive returns. Combine that with 2020 being a year where Robinhood investors, or in other words younger investors who had more free time on their hands, became interested in the stock market, options trading, crypto currencies, and other investments. What’s interesting about 2020 is that many of the names or asset classes that people are familiar with or use every day happened to be some of the best performers of the year. Years like this don’t always play out this way, but Peter Lynch’s quote of “Invest in what you know” certainty paid off this year with individual’s taking products that they own/use frequently and investing in them. The above provides a sampling of some of top performers of 2020. As you can see you probably interact with of these line items daily. 

4 sp500.jpg

While what we have experienced nationally (and globally) this year has been unprecedented, in the context of the last 40 years of market returns it is not abnormal. Since the start of 1980, the S&P500 (excluding dividends) has returned an annualized 9%. Despite having average intra-year drops of 13.8%, the market has finished positive 75% of the time. Short-term market volatility has paved the way to long-term investment returns, and 2020 has proven no different.

For us investors, this is a reminder to remain invested through the market turbulence. Patience is a requirement for long-term success. Warren Buffet said it best with his quote, 

“The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient.” - Warren Buffet

5 sp500.jpg

This chart illustrates the consequences of hitting the “panic button” when we experience market turbulence. If we buckle up and hang on tight, there is potential to see long term growth versus throwing on the parachute and cashing out (hitting that proverbial panic button). 

6 interest rates.jpg

Opportunists unite. With historically low interest rates, many people have taken this opportunity to refinance their mortgages. By refinancing their mortgages, individuals and families have improved monthly cash flow, decreased the amount of interest paid over the life of their loan (often saving tens of thousands of dollars over a 15-, 20-, or 30-year period), and shortened the length of their mortgage. To join the rest of the opportunists, see our post Refinancing Your Mortgage: A How to Guide

7 unemployment.jpg

In March alone, the number of initial unemployment insurance (UI) claims increased by more than 3,000% as businesses closed to slow the spread of the coronavirus. People have suffered this year, and none of us will look back at this time and wish we did less.

This graph focuses on unemployment, but we know that hospitalizations, closures, and fear also increased in the first half of 2020. In a time of desperation, our communities responded to the suffering in an inspiring way. Specifically, the number of small charitable donations ($250 or less) increased 19.2% over the first six months of 2020 compared to 2019. You know someone who has been unemployed this year, and you also know someone who used dollars to alleviate some of the widespread grief.

We hope these visuals help you digest some financial information from this past year. We don’t know how 2021 will unfold, but we do know that market timing is dangerous and most of the time impossible. Staying the course is candidly a boring investment strategy, but one that typically yields the best results.  

 

 
signature-HI Team.png
 

Related Articles

It might be time to Maximize your Intel SERPLUS Deferred Compensation Plan
 

Perhaps now more than ever, it makes sense to increase your deferral to the SERPLUS deferred compensation plan. The following chart compares current tax rates to the proposed tax rates by the new administration.

Web 1920 – 1.png

Though we are uncertain when the tax changes will be implemented, we do know that tax rates will increase. If taxes increase, your deferred compensation benefits may become even more important for your tax planning.

TAP INTO Significant Tax and Income Benefits

Deferred compensation plans provide an opportunity to receive less income today in order to pay less taxes on that income when received in the future. When making annual deferred compensation elections, you have the choice of a 5-year, 10-year, or lump sum payment at retirement (when employment with Intel ends). If you plan to retire at 62, you could elect to receive distributions for 10 years from your SERPLUS plan to stretch out your income and realize it in a lower tax bracket until age 72. With this plan, you have deferred compensation income providing for your first 10 years of retirement. In your early 70’s, social security and required IRA distributions will supplement your steady income stream, and eventually replace your deferred compensation income.  

Spreading deferred compensation income out over 10 years allows you to take it in a lower tax bracket, like 21% for Federal and State combined or 24% combined after 2025. This tax deferral would provide for a tax reduction between 23% and 35%. In a hypothetical scenario, $50,000 contributed per year over 15 years would total $750,000 (without earnings computed). The income deferral could provide $172,500 in tax savings in a conservative example and $262,500 in savings in a more generous example. That is real money in your pocket rather than in the Federal and State governments. 

In the peak earning years of your life, with your 401k maxed out and not providing enough tax deferral and future income, the SERPLUS deferred compensation plan is a great tool to help increase both.

Cash Flow Considerations AND SOLUTIONS

If you do participate in the plan, your current take-home pay will decrease.  If cash flow becomes tight, there are opportunities within your employee benefits that could help provide the needed funds. It may be advisable to sell some company stock (ESPP, RSUs) to supplement your monthly income so that you can participate in the plan and defer income. Keep in mind, your election made in 2020 on salary is for the 2021 income year, whereas the bonus election is for the bonus paid in 2022. A portion of the bonus could be especially important to defer in 2022 considering the proposed tax changes. 

Questions ABOUT YOUR INTEL BENEFITS?

If you have questions about making deferred compensation elections, please schedule a call.

 

 
 

When it Comes to Market Volatility, Don't Rely on Your Emotions, Rely on Your Financial Plan
 
adrian-FrSEEdYr418-unsplash.jpg

Recently I received a note from a longtime Human Investing client. He was following up on a discussion we had back in March, where he, like others, was concerned about where the market was headed. Here is a mostly intact version of what he said:

I just wanted to thank you and acknowledge your sound advice eight months ago when everything was running off the edge. Since then, we are up more than $250K (17%) and above where we were then. The reality is that had I pulled out, I would not have gotten back in before missing most of the bounce back. Hindsight can be wonderful when you do not make the wrong decision!  My friend, who sold out in March, is still hanging onto the belief that we are headed down again. Who knows the future.

A Discussion Goes a Long Way

The purpose of this note is not to take a victory lap for the advice we dispensed. Instead, it highlights how a discussion can help put investing in perspective in a tense market moment. This client has 50% of their portfolio in safe investments, like high-credit quality bonds and cash. The remaining portion is in broadly diversified equities. Despite having enough cash and bonds on hand to live a decade without having to touch their equities, they had a concern. The discussion with this client revolved around whether they needed more than ten years of cash and bonds to live and focused less on market timing. In the end, it was the client who decided to hold tight, not me. I was the one who removed myself from the emotion of the situation and was there to ask the right questions. 

Throughout my career, my role in the client’s life has evolved. In the mid-90s, we were providing stock recommendations and picking money managers. Today, we rely on trading algorithms from Morningstar and low-cost index funds from Vanguard and Barclay’s. The quantitative work has shifted from money management to financial planning and tax planning/compliance. This work is done by my colleagues at Human Investing: Andrew Gladhill, CFA, Marc Kadomatsu, CFP, Amber Jones, CPA, and Luke Schultz, CPA. On the flip side of the quantitative work is qualitative research, which involves non-numerical data. Qualitative research comes from our interaction with clients and hearing about their feelings, emotions, and opinions. These qualitative insights are paramount to a successful retirement plan. Some might argue that emotion and opinion can derail the best of financial plans. This is at the heart of the above quote. Quantitatively, the client was in great shape, but their “in the moment emotions” almost derailed a great retirement plan. 

Dalbar Inc. provides performance information on the “average investor”. Figure 1 is a chart I have tracked for years. One of the many reasons why the “average investor” does so poorly versus the returns of various asset classes and stock/bond mixes is due to their emotions. Having someone to talk to about these thoughts and feelings can be helpful.  If the plan permits and valid concerns arise from the discussion, then changes can be made.  However, if the change is not rooted in probability and the financial plan, there is the potential that the decision being made can be harmful.

Figure 1

Investing over the long run

It is interesting to see the S&P 500, dating back to the year I started in the financial services profession. Figure 2 depicts much relevant information. Most notably is the long term upward trending line during my career. If we went back to the early 1900s, the chart would look similar—lots of ups and downs with a trend line that moves up over time. 

Figure 2

Sometimes, the drops in the market happen gradually—as do their recoveries (as was the case in 2000). Other times, market volatility stems from “counterparty risk,” which was the case in 2007 when the housing market and credit created uncertainty. In the most recent case, the severe volatility was brought upon by fear from a pandemic and an uncertain future. Regardless of the reason, volatility is a natural part of investing in the stock market. My observation is that volatility is permanent. Surprises (both up and down) are common. The financial plan, which is a quantitative document developed by credentialed experts, can be worth its weight in gold. It can act as a financial roadmap when you feel lost—and provide an advisor like me the data-points to dispense proper advice during anxious moments.

 

 
 

The Importance of a College Education
 
nathan-dumlao-ewGMqs2tmJI-unsplash.jpg

On a recent financial planning call with colleague Amber Jones and a new client of our firm, we had a chance to discuss college savings for their daughter. It is always interesting to hear how families view college for their children and grandchildren. Some consider college a necessary expense, while others view college as an investment. Regardless of your college position, I thought it would be helpful to look at unemployment levels by education and income, based on the type of education an individual achieves. The numbers paint an incredible picture. Figure 1 underscores the importance of going to college. Not only are those with college degrees employed more consistently, but their annual earnings are nearly double those with a high school degree.

  Figure 1. Employment and income by education attainment

  Figure 1. Employment and income by education attainment

In short, Figure 1 makes a good case for encouraging your children (and grandchildren) to go to college. Yes, there are dozens of college alternatives, including starting a business or going to trade school. We all know successful individuals who never stepped foot in college or tried a university and decided it was not for them. I hope this article is taken in the way it was intended—that is, if college is an option, it is an excellent investment worth the sacrifice. 

Maybe you are a grandparent trying to think of a gift for your granddaughter—fund a college savings account. Maybe you are a parent wondering if college is a good investment—the answer is yes, fund a college savings account. Or possibly you are a teenager considering going to college—do what you can to make it happen. College is a sacrifice for families and for the one that is bold enough to attend.  Nevertheless, the payoff can be significant. As far as an investment goes, I can think of no better. 

If you have questions about college, funding a college savings account, or if you just want to have a thinking partner on the topic, call us; we would love to hear from you. College comes in many shapes and sizes. For example, a four-year degree, split between community college and Portland State University, averages less than $8,000 per year. Even if loans are required to meet tuition demands, the potential return on investment is immediate and over a lifetime, sizeable.

 

 
 

Related Articles

Consistency is Key When Fighting the Dad Bod and Growing Your Investments
 
cyril-saulnier-TsVN31Dzyv4-unsplash.jpg

On September 1st, my beautiful wife and I welcomed our new son into the world. His arrival has brought our family much joy during this season. Like all newborns, he has also brought sleepless nights, an abundance of comfort food, and disruption to our schedules and disciplines. As a result, I am here to tell you from personal experience the “dad bod” is real (find out if you have a dad bod here).

As I begin the journey to get back in shape, exercise and clean eating seem more difficult than ever before. Had I maintained my regimented sleep, diet, and exercise schedule throughout the entire pregnancy, returning to my baseline wouldn’t be as challenging. In physics, we call this inertia. In finance, we call this the compounding effect.  

Like most things in life, there is a compounding effect on our actions. 

  • Consistency in showing up to work → proficiency at your job. 

  • Consistency in showing up in the lives of loved ones → richer relationships. 

  • Consistency with a sustainable diet and exercise plan → greater physical health. 

  • Consistency in following a prudent investment strategy → increased net worth. 

Consistency is integral to the compounding effect

The inverse is also true. Disruption is a detriment to the compounding effect, a truth for our fitness as well as our investment accounts. To quote Charlie Munger, Warren Buffet's partner at Berkshire Hathaway —“The first rule of compounding is to never interrupt it unnecessarily”.

I would argue that someone’s consistency often has a greater impact than their effort and resources. Take the following example of two investors: 

  • Investor A - saves $2K/year from age 26-65.  

  • Investor B - saves $2K/year from age 19-26 and stops there.  

  • Both achieve a 10% annual return.*  

At age 65, who ends up with more money?  

  • Investor A: $883,185  

  • Investor B: $941,054 

By saving and investing $2,000 at the beginning of each year from age 26 to 65 (39 total years), Investor A can expect to have a final balance of $883,185. Investor B only saves for 8 years but starts to save earlier in life than Investor A. Investor B benefits by taking advantage of 46 years of compounding growth, finishing with a balance of $941,054.

What Investor B lacks in consistency of contributions, they make up for in consistency of not interrupting the compounding effect on their investment account. I know you are probably curious, what would happen if Investor B did not stop contributing at age 26? Investor B’s account balance would be $1,902,309. Once again consistency wins out.

Start now and stick with it

  • There are no shortcuts to saving for retirement and fighting the "dad bod". Starting can be difficult and sometimes painfully slow, however, the long-term results can be powerful. 

  • The easiest advice to give is “never get off track.” However, like your sleep schedule with a newborn, there are some things you cannot control. It is important to know how to reassess and get back to work.  

  • Building anything valuable and defensible takes time, effort, and energy. Build a plan today.  

If you want to compare notes on raising a newborn, see baby photos, or discuss the impact of consistency when building a prudent financial plan, please reach out. We are here for you.

*This is for illustrative and discussion purposes only. Investment results will vary.

 

 
 

Related Articles

The Difference Between Speculating and Planning
 

A week ago, I came across a chart that does a nice job representing the call volume we have been experiencing at Human Investing in 2020. While the amount of calls we receive does not equal the amount of times people search for CNBC, the two data points are certainly correlated.

google-searches-stocks-cnbc-hartford.jpg

The image is titled, “When Markets Fall, We Search”, and ultimately shows that individuals have been more likely to seek out CNBC (market related news) any time the market has fallen over the last 15 years.

I’d argue that you could replace ‘search’ with ‘speculate’ and both the phrase and the chart would remain true, “when markets fall, we speculate”. Given the state of current affairs and the upcoming presidential election, individuals are worrying about their retirement accounts. A growing number of conversations our team has with individuals inside of retirement plans sound something like this:

Caller: “I’m fearful of (X) candidate winning the election because I’m affiliated with (Y) political party (both sides are saying this). Additionally, there is uncertainty around COVID, and I don’t feel comfortable staying invested during these unpredictable times. I’d like you (Human Investing) to help provide me with a more conservative investment recommendation.”

Before I respond with market research, I want to reiterate that you aren’t alone with your concerns and fear. We hear you. At the same time, before making any decisions related to your portfolio, take the time to think through all the angles of your decision. The rest of this post will hopefully provide some anecdotes in your process. Here are few thoughts about what it looks like to plan for the end of 2020 and into 2021. Remember, it is better to plan than to speculate.

The correlation between your Politics and Your Portfolio

Generally speaking, there is low correlation between political parties and the stock market. However, that statement is easy to say and difficult to live out in practice. Tread lightly when reading articles that try to align which stock/sectors to own with the political party that takes office. This article from 2016 couldn’t have been more wrong prognosticating that energy companies (specifically Exxon Mobile) would be top performers for the proceeding four years. It goes without saying this was a massive miss.

stock-and-sector-returns-since-2016.jpg

The bigger influence: Are you a speculator or planner?

If you think like a speculator, you will make rash decisions around your investment accounts and have no plan for re-entering the market if you move your dollars to cash or to a conservative investment.  

If you think like a planner, you will use both quantitative and qualitative measurements to evaluate your decision. For example:

  • If you have a long-term horizon (greater than 15-20 years), political changes should not impact your investment decisions.

  • Irrespective of the political environment, review if your account is too aggressive or too conservative for your financial landscape.

  • Have a clear understanding of both candidate’s tax policies. Changes to the federal tax code should be a factor in your financial planning for the remainder of 2020 and into the future. If you are working with a CPA and/or Financial Advisor, make sure they are staying abreast with any impactful tax code changes.

annualized-asset-class-returns-presidents.jpg

Ditching The Market

Trying to time the market when negative news arises (or the anticipation of negative news) is a dangerous game to play. Luckily, we have a recent case study of how dangerous it can be. From January 1st to March 23rd, the stock market fell 30%. Since then, the market has recovered all losses and then some. If you were thinking like a spectator, it would have been easy to create a narrative around mid-March to pull your money out of the market and wait for greener pastures. If an investor did so, most likely that investor is still waiting for the market to dip and has missed out on the recent recovery as indicated by the second chart.

sp-500-returns-2020.jpg

If you think like a planner when the market is more volatile, sometimes taking some form of action itches a behavioral scratch. Here are some ways to take action while not compromising your account:

  • Raise your contribution in your retirement account to take advantage of a decreasing market (buying more shares at discounted prices).

  • Open a small “fun money” account to track if your predictions are correct.

  • If the market does significantly drop, look at converting pre-tax dollars to ROTH.

The concept of thinking like a speculator vs. thinking like a planner represents the cultural moment we are living in right now.

Speculating = headlines, fast moving social media, and the potential for instant gratification.

Planning = well thought out strategies that take time and often require no action.

As we head into this season of elections and COVID uncertainty, I hope this post provides some perspective on how to approach your portfolio. As always feel free to reach out to our team to talk through your thought process. We are happy to help!

 

 
 

Related Articles